![]() |
|
volume
one volume two volume three volume four volume five volume six volume eight volume nine volume ten volume eleven volume twelve volume thirteen volume fourteen volume fifteen |
Volume 12, Number 1, 2012 Abstracts Associate Prof. Leo Bowman and Dr Kasun Ubayasiri This study makes out the case for the use of the Conversational Analytic method as a research approach that might both extricate and chronicle the features of the journalism interview. It seeks to encourage such research to help inform understanding of this form and to provide further lessons as to the nature of journalism practice. Such studies might follow many paths but this paper focuses more particularly on the outcomes for the debate as to the continued relevance of “objectivity” in informing journalism professional practice. To make out the case for the veracity of CA as a means through which the conduct of journalism practice might be explored the paper examines: the theories of the interaction order that gave rise to the CA method; outlines the key features of the journalism interview as explicated through the CA approach; outlines the implications of such research for the establishment of the standing of “objectivity”. It concludes as to the wider relevance of such studies of journalism practice for a fracturing journalism field, which suffers from a lack of benchmarks to measure the public benefit of the range of forms that now proliferate on the internet.
|
Editor Advisory Panel Dr Judith Clarke, Baptist University, Hong Kong Elliott S. Parker, Central Michigan University, USA Dr Lee Richard Duffield, Queensland University of Technology Jim Tully, University of Canterbury, New Zealand Dr Kasun Ubayasiri, Griffith University, Brisbane Philip Cass, Unitec, Auckland, New Zealand Dr Stephen Stockwell, Griffith University, Gold Coast Dr Steve Quinn, University of Nottingham, Ningbo, China |
||||||||
Ejournalist: refereed media journal. ISSN 1444-741X